The Economist

Soc. Then there is no reason why a proficient in this art, even if he does not happen to possess wealth of his own, should not be paid a salary for managing a house, just as he might be paid for building one?

Soc. Then shall we say that a man's enemies form part of his possessions?

Crit. You seem to say, Socrates, that money itself in the pockets of a man who does not know how to use it is not wealth?