ogers’s psychological therapy involves encountering the client on her own terms, and trying to see the world from her perspective. As Brodley has stated, the only reality relevant to the person’s development and healing is reality as perceived by the client herself. In this sense, within the context of therapy, the theory of personality and motivation as formulated by Carl R. Rogers (1959) is as irrelevant as any other biopsychosocial or psychiatric theory! In other words, the therapist is not aiming at convincing the client that he possesses an actualizing tendency or even that his experiences are worthy of respect. In the grand gamble regarding success or failure in therapy, Rogers puts his bets on the client’s actual experiencing of the core conditions as a path to a more nuanced, self-differentiating, accepting, and authoritative experience of the organism—hence, a more congruent self.